Should Schools Build Synthetic Running Tracks? In recent years, there has been a growing trend among schools to build synthetic running tracks made of materials such as rubber and polyurethane. The proponents of these tracks argue that they offer many benefits over traditional asphalt or concrete tracks, including improved safety, durability, and performance. However, opponents argue that these tracks are expensive, environmentally unfriendly, and unnecessary. In this article, we will examine both sides of the debate and try to determine whether schools should build synthetic running tracks. One of the primary arguments in favor of synthetic running tracks is that they offer improved safety over traditional tracks. Unlike asphalt or concrete, which can become slippery and dangerous in wet conditions, synthetic tracks offer a high level of traction and grip, reducing the risk of slips and falls. Additionally, synthetic tracks are designed to absorb impact, reducing the risk of injury to athletes. This is especially important for young athletes who are still developing their bodies and may be more susceptible to injury. Another argument in favor of synthetic tracks is that they are more durable than traditional tracks. Asphalt and concrete tracks can become cracked and damaged over time, requiring costly repairs and maintenance. Synthetic tracks, on the other hand, are designed to withstand heavy use and require minimal maintenance. This can save schools money in the long run by reducing the need for repairs and replacements. Proponents of synthetic tracks also argue that they offer improved performance over traditional tracks. Synthetic tracks are designed to provide a consistent surface with a high level of energy return, allowing athletes to run faster and jump higher. Additionally, synthetic tracks can be customized to meet the needs of different sports, with different levels of cushioning and traction depending on the sport being played. However, opponents of synthetic tracks argue that they are expensive and environmentally unfriendly. Synthetic tracks are typically more expensive to install than traditional tracks, and they require specialized equipment and expertise to install and maintain. Additionally, synthetic tracks are made from petroleum-based materials, which are not biodegradable and can contribute to environmental pollution. Opponents also argue that synthetic tracks are unnecessary, and that schools should focus on improving existing facilities rather than building new ones. Many schools already have asphalt or concrete tracks that could be resurfaced or repaired to improve safety and performance. Additionally, schools could invest in other sports facilities, such as weight rooms or basketball courts, which may have a greater impact on student athletes. In conclusion, the debate over whether schools should build synthetic running tracks is complex and multifaceted. While synthetic tracks offer many benefits over traditional tracks, such as improved safety, durability, and performance, they are also expensive and environmentally unfriendly. Ultimately, the decision of whether to build a synthetic track should be based on the needs and priorities of each individual school. Schools should carefully consider the costs and benefits of synthetic tracks and determine whether they are the best use of their resources.